Publication Benchmarking Data Based on Faculty Promoted at the Top 75 U.S. Accounting Research Institutions

ABSTRACT

The primary purpose of this study is to update the Glover et al. (2006) publication benchmarking study by providing benchmarking statistics of faculty promoted to associate and/or full professor from 2004 to 2009. We also extend Glover et al. (2006) by examining new benchmarking metrics and by investigating publication productivity differences between studies. Our results indicate that, on average, faculty promoted from 2004 to 2009 had more publications in leading accounting journals at the time of promotion than faculty promoted from 1995 to 2003. We explore possible explanations for the increase in publication productivity. We find that increases in the time to promotion, number of total published journal articles, and number of co-authors can explain some, but not all of the observed increase in publication productivity. Finally, we find that publication records at the time of promotion are similar between public and private institutions within similar university publication productivity portfolios.

Keywords:  accounting faculty publications, promotion decision, benchmarking publications, tenure decisions

Steven M. Glover is a Professor, Douglas F. Prawitt is a Professor, Scott L. Summers is a Professor, and David A. Wood is an Assistant Professor, all at Brigham Young University.

Source : Steven M. Glover, Douglas F. Prawitt, Scott L. Summers, David A. Wood (2012) Publication Benchmarking Data Based on Faculty Promoted at the Top 75 U.S. Accounting Research Institutions. Issues in Accounting Education: August 2012, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 647-670.