ABSTRACT
The paper contributes to the literature in three main areas. First, it demonstrates how evidence-based reasoning can be used for engagements where different levels of assurance are provided for the assertions being audited. Second, it shows how various items of evidence at different levels may be aggregated. Third, it presents a generic theoretical model for assuring information based on belief-based assessments, which is then contrasted with a theoretical model based on probability theory. In contrasting the two approaches, we show that in cases where initial uncertainty is substantial, the use of Dempster-Shafer theory has advantages over probability theory in terms of efficiency in achieving a targeted low level of assurance.
Keywords: information system assurance, sustainability reports, evidential reasoning, Dempster-Shafer theory, belief functions, Bayesian approach
Article Citation:
Rajendra P. Srivastava, Sunita S. Rao, and Theodore J. Mock (2013) Planning and Evaluation of Assurance Services for Sustainability Reporting: An Evidential Reasoning Approach. Journal of Information Systems: Fall 2013, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 107-126.
No comments:
Post a Comment